arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1202.1297 [hep-ph]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Comparison of Some Exact and Perturbative Results for a Supersymmetric SU($N_c$) Gauge Theory

Thomas A. Ryttov, Robert Shrock

Published 2012-02-06Version 1

We consider vectorial, asymptotically free ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetric SU($N_c$) gauge theories with $N_f$ copies of massless chiral super fields in various representations and study how perturbative predictions for the lower boundary of the infrared conformal phase, as a function of $N_f$, compare with exact results. We make use of two-loop and three-loop calculations of the beta function and anomalous dimension of the quadratic chiral super field operator product for this purpose. The specific chiral superfield contents that we consider are $N_f$ copies of (i) $F+\bar F$, (ii) $Adj$, (iii) $S_2+\bar S_2$, and (iv) $A_2 + \bar A_2$, where $F$, $Adj$, $S_2$, and $A_2$ denote, respectively, the fundamental, adjoint, and symmetric and antisymmetric rank-2 tensor representations. We find that perturbative results slightly overestimate the value of $N_{f,cr}$ relative to the respective exact results for these representations, i.e., slightly underestimate the interval in $N_f$ for which the theory has infrared conformal behavior. Our results provide a measure of how closely perturbative calculations reproduce exact results for these theories.

Comments: 16 pages, 3 figures
Journal: Phys. Rev. D85, 076009 (2012)
Categories: hep-ph, hep-lat, hep-th
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:hep-ph/0404214 (Published 2004-04-23)
Illuminating interfaces between phases of a U(1) x U(1) gauge theory
arXiv:1011.5917 [hep-ph] (Published 2010-11-26, updated 2017-09-16)
UV and IR Zeros of Gauge Theories at The Four Loop Order and Beyond
arXiv:1304.3274 [hep-ph] (Published 2013-04-11)
Differences and similarities between fundamental and adjoint matters in SU(N) gauge theories