arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:quant-ph/0307156AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

On the Quantum Phase Operator for Coherent States

Bo-Sture K. Skagerstam, Bjorn A. Bergsjordet

Published 2003-07-22, updated 2004-03-16Version 2

In papers by Lynch [Phys. Rev. A41, 2841 (1990)] and Gerry and Urbanski [Phys. Rev. A42, 662 (1990)] it has been argued that the phase-fluctuation laser experiments of Gerhardt, B\"uchler and Lifkin [Phys. Lett. 49A, 119 (1974)] are in good agreement with the variance of the Pegg-Barnett phase operator for a coherent state, even for a small number of photons. We argue that this is not conclusive. In fact, we show that the variance of the phase in fact depends on the relative phase between the phase of the coherent state and the off-set phase $\phi_0$ of the Pegg-Barnett phase operator. This off-set phase is replaced with the phase of a reference beam in an actual experiment and we show that several choices of such a relative phase can be fitted to the experimental data. We also discuss the Noh, Foug\`{e}res and Mandel [Phys.Rev. A46, 2840 (1992)] relative phase experiment in terms of the Pegg-Barnett phase taking post-selection conditions into account.

Comments: 8 pages, 8 figures. Typographical errors and misprints have been corrected. The outline of the paper has also been changed. Physica Scripta (in press)
Categories: quant-ph
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1508.04412 [quant-ph] (Published 2015-08-18)
Adaptive characterization of coherent states
arXiv:0911.0073 [quant-ph] (Published 2009-10-31)
Coherent state of a nonlinear oscillator and its revival dynamics
arXiv:1902.02566 [quant-ph] (Published 2019-02-07)
Generating strong anti-bunching by interfering with coherent states