arXiv:astro-ph/0206177AbstractReferencesReviewsResources
Planetary Nebulae as Standard Candles. XII. Connecting the Population I and Population II Distance Scales
Robin Ciardullo, John J. Feldmeier, George H. Jacoby, Rachel Kuzio de Naray, Mary Beth Laychak, Patrick R. Durrell
Published 2002-06-11Version 1
We report the results of [OIII] lambda 5007 surveys for planetary nebulae (PNe) in NGC 2403, 3115, 3351, 3627, 4258, and 5866. Using on-band/off-band [OIII] and H-alpha images, we identify samples of PNe in these galaxies and derive distances using the planetary nebula luminosity function (PNLF). We then combine these measurements with previous data to compare the PNLF, Cepheid, and surface brightness fluctuation (SBF) distance scales. We use a sample of 13 galaxies to show that the absolute magnitude of the PNLF cutoff is fainter in small, low-metallicity systems, but the trend is well modelled theoretically. When this dependence is removed, the scatter between the Cepheid and PNLF distances becomes consistent with the internal errors of the methods and independent of any obvious galaxy parameter. We then use the data to recalibrate the zero point of the PNLF distance scale. We use a sample of 28 galaxies to show that the scatter between the PNLF and SBF distance measurements agrees with that predicted from the techniques' internal errors, and that no systematic trend exists between the distance residuals and stellar population. However, we find the PNLF and SBF methods have a significant scale offset: Cepheid-calibrated PNLF distances are, on average, ~0.3 mag smaller than Cepheid-calibrated SBF distances. We discuss the possible causes of this offset, and suggest that internal extinction in the bulges of the SBF calibration galaxies is the principle cause of the discrepancy. If this is correct, the SBF-based Hubble Constant must be increased by ~7%. We use our distance to NGC 4258 to argue that the short distance scale to the LMC is correct, and that the global Hubble Constant inferred from the HST Key Project should be increased by 8 +/- 3% to H_0 = 78 +/- 7 km/s/Mpc. (abridged)