arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2310.20255 [nucl-th]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

New ANCs for $α+ {}^{12}{\rm C}$ synthesis obtained using extrapolation method and the $S$-factor for ${}^{12}{\rm C}(α,γ){}^{16}{\rm O}$ radiative capture

A. M. Mukhamedzhanov, R. J. deBoer, B. F. Irgaziev, L. D. Blokhintsev, A. S. Kadyrov, D. A. Savin

Published 2023-10-31Version 1

Background: The $^{12}{\rm C}(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}$O reaction, determining the survival of carbon in red giants, is of interest for nuclear reaction theory and nuclear astrophysics. Numerous attempts to obtain the astrophysical factor of the $^{12}{\rm C}(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}$O reaction, both experimental and theoretical, have been made for almost 50 years. The specifics of the $^{16}$O nuclear structure is the presence of two subthreshold bound states, (6.92 MeV, 2$^+$) and (7.12 MeV, 1$^-$), dominating the behavior of the low-energy $S$-factor. The strength of these subthreshold states is determined by their asymptotic normalization coefficients (ANCs) which need to be known with high accuracy. Recently, using the model-independent extrapolation method, Blokhintsev {\it et al.} [Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 59}, 162 (2023)] determined the ANCs for the three subthreshold states in $^{16}$O. Purpose: In this paper, using these newly determined ANCs, we calculated the low-energy astrophysical $S$-factors for the $^{12}{\rm C}(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}$O radiative capture. Method: The $S$-factors are calculated within the framework of the $R$-matrix method using the AZURE2 code. Conclusion: Our total $S$-factor includes the resonance $E1$ and $E2$ transitions to the ground state of $^{16}$O interfering with the corresponding direct captures and cascade radiative captures to the ground state of $^{16}$O through four subthreshold states: $0_2^+,\,3^-,\, 2^+$ and $1^-$. Since our ANCs are higher than those used by deBoer {\it et al.} [Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 89}, 035007 (2017)], the present total $S$-factor at the most effective astrophysical energy of 300 keV is 174 keVb versus 137 keVb of that work. Accordingly, our calculated reaction rate at low temperatures ($T_{9} < 2$) is higher than the one given in the aforesaid paper.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1408.2920 [nucl-th] (Published 2014-08-13)
The container picture with two-alpha correlation for the ground state of $^{12}$C
arXiv:nucl-th/0002022 (Published 2000-02-08)
Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of A=8 nuclei
arXiv:nucl-th/0108052 (Published 2001-08-22)
Towards understanding the probability of $0^+$ ground states in even-even many-body systems