arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2307.03886 [cs.LG]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

On Regularization and Inference with Label Constraints

Kaifu Wang, Hangfeng He, Tin D. Nguyen, Piyush Kumar, Dan Roth

Published 2023-07-08Version 1

Prior knowledge and symbolic rules in machine learning are often expressed in the form of label constraints, especially in structured prediction problems. In this work, we compare two common strategies for encoding label constraints in a machine learning pipeline, regularization with constraints and constrained inference, by quantifying their impact on model performance. For regularization, we show that it narrows the generalization gap by precluding models that are inconsistent with the constraints. However, its preference for small violations introduces a bias toward a suboptimal model. For constrained inference, we show that it reduces the population risk by correcting a model's violation, and hence turns the violation into an advantage. Given these differences, we further explore the use of two approaches together and propose conditions for constrained inference to compensate for the bias introduced by regularization, aiming to improve both the model complexity and optimal risk.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1810.00123 [cs.LG] (Published 2018-09-29)
Generalization and Regularization in DQN
arXiv:2305.00927 [cs.LG] (Published 2023-05-01)
Cross-Institutional Transfer Learning for Educational Models: Implications for Model Performance, Fairness, and Equity
arXiv:2406.11779 [cs.LG] (Published 2024-06-17, updated 2024-06-18)
Provable Guarantees for Model Performance via Mechanistic Interpretability
Jason Gross et al.