arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:2306.12213 [cs.CL]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Limits for Learning with Language Models

Nicholas Asher, Swarnadeep Bhar, Akshay Chaturvedi, Julie Hunter, Soumya Paul

Published 2023-06-21Version 1

With the advent of large language models (LLMs), the trend in NLP has been to train LLMs on vast amounts of data to solve diverse language understanding and generation tasks. The list of LLM successes is long and varied. Nevertheless, several recent papers provide empirical evidence that LLMs fail to capture important aspects of linguistic meaning. Focusing on universal quantification, we provide a theoretical foundation for these empirical findings by proving that LLMs cannot learn certain fundamental semantic properties including semantic entailment and consistency as they are defined in formal semantics. More generally, we show that LLMs are unable to learn concepts beyond the first level of the Borel Hierarchy, which imposes severe limits on the ability of LMs, both large and small, to capture many aspects of linguistic meaning. This means that LLMs will continue to operate without formal guarantees on tasks that require entailments and deep linguistic understanding.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2208.02957 [cs.CL] (Published 2022-08-05)
Meaning without reference in large language models
arXiv:2211.05853 [cs.CL] (Published 2022-11-10)
Measuring Reliability of Large Language Models through Semantic Consistency
arXiv:2212.03551 [cs.CL] (Published 2022-12-07)
Talking About Large Language Models