arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1802.00085 [math.NT]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Explicit bounds for primes in arithmetic progressions

Michael A. Bennett, Greg Martin, Kevin O'Bryant, Andrew Rechnitzer

Published 2018-01-31Version 1

We derive explicit upper bounds for various functions counting primes in arithmetic progressions. By way of example, if $q$ and $a$ are integers with $\gcd(a,q)=1$ and $3 \leq q \leq 10^5$, and $\theta(x;q,a)$ denotes the sum of the logarithms of the primes $p \equiv a \pmod{q}$ with $p \leq x$, we show that $$ \bigg| \theta (x; q, a) - \frac{x}{\phi (q)} \bigg| < \frac1{3600} \frac q{\phi(q)} \frac{x}{\log x}, $$ for all $x \geq 7.94 \cdot 10^9$ (with sharper constants obtained for individual such moduli $q$). We establish inequalities of the same shape for the other standard prime-counting functions $\pi(x;q,a)$ and $\psi(x;q,a)$, as well as inequalities for the $n$th prime congruent to $a\pmod q$ when $q\le4500$. For moduli $q>10^5$, we find even stronger explicit inequalities, but only for much larger values of $x$. Along the way, we also derive an improved explicit lower bound for $L(1,\chi)$ for quadratic characters $\chi$, and an improved explicit upper bound for exceptional zeros.

Comments: 66 pages. Results of computations, and the code used for those computations, can be found at: http://www.nt.math.ubc.ca/BeMaObRe/
Categories: math.NT
Subjects: 11N13, 11N37, 11M20, 11M26, 11Y35, 11Y40
Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1309.5798 [math.NT] (Published 2013-09-23, updated 2014-02-15)
Explicit formulae for primes in arithmetic progressions, II
arXiv:1606.04877 [math.NT] (Published 2016-06-15)
Chebyshev's bias for products of $k$ primes
arXiv:1304.5988 [math.NT] (Published 2013-04-22, updated 2015-10-22)
The least modulus for which consecutive polynomial values are distinct