arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1706.07424 [hep-th]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Loss of locality in gravitational correlators with a large number of insertions

Sudip Ghosh, Suvrat Raju

Published 2017-06-22Version 1

We review lessons from the AdS/CFT correspondence that indicate that the emergence of locality in quantum gravity is contingent on considering observables with a small number of insertions. Correlation functions where the number of insertions scales with a power of the central charge of the CFT are sensitive to nonlocal effects in the bulk theory, which arise from a combination of the effects of the bulk Gauss law and a breakdown of perturbation theory. To examine whether a similar effect occurs in flat space, we consider the scattering of massless particles in the bosonic string and the superstring in the limit where the number of external particles, n, becomes very large. We use estimates of the volume of the Weil-Petersson moduli space of punctured Riemann surfaces to argue that string amplitudes grow factorially in this limit. We verify this factorial behaviour through an extensive numerical analysis of string amplitudes at large n. Our numerical calculations rely on the observation that, in the large n limit, the string scattering amplitude localizes on the Gross-Mende saddle points, even though individual particle energies are small. This factorial growth implies the breakdown of string perturbation theory for $n \sim (M_{pl}/E)^{d-2}$ in d dimensions where E is the typical individual particle energy. We explore the implications of this breakdown for the black hole information paradox. We show that the loss of locality suggested by this breakdown is precisely sufficient to resolve the cloning and strong subadditivity paradoxes.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:hep-th/0101051 (Published 2001-01-09)
On the spectrum of QCD(1+1) with large numbers of flavours N_F and colours N_C near N_F/N_C = 0
arXiv:2108.05744 [hep-th] (Published 2021-08-12)
Future Boundaries and the Black Hole Information Paradox
arXiv:1406.0807 [hep-th] (Published 2014-06-03)
Remnants, Fuzzballs or Wormholes?