Survey Cross-Calibration with The Cannon: APOGEE-scale Stellar Labels from LAMOST Spectra

Anna Y. Q. Ho, Melissa K. Ness, David W. Hogg, Hans-Walter Rix, Chao Liu, Fan Yang, Yong Zhang, Yonghui Hou, Yuefei Wang

Published 2016-01-31Version 1

To capitalize on a diverse set of large spectroscopic stellar surveys, it is essential to develop techniques for precise and accurate survey cross-calibration. Here, we demonstrate that this can be achieved by a data-driven approach to spectral modeling: we use The Cannon (Ness et al. 2015) to cross-calibrate APOGEE and LAMOST, two large-scale surveys that currently yield inconsistent results due to differing experimental setups and data analysis methodologies. The Cannon constructs a predictive model for LAMOST spectra using a reference set of 9952 stars observed in common between the two surveys, taking five labels as ground truth from APOGEE DR12: Teff, log g, [Fe/H], [\alpha/M], and K-band extinction A_k. The model is then used to infer Teff, log g, [Fe/H], and [\alpha/M] for 454,180 giant stars in LAMOST DR2, thus tying low-resolution (R=1800) LAMOST spectra to the APOGEE (R=22,500) label scale. Despite being derived directly from LAMOST spectra, which have lower spectral resolution and very different wavelength coverage, these new Cannon labels have an accuracy and precision comparable to the stated APOGEE DR12 values and uncertainties, essentially eliminating the systematic label inconsistencies resulting from the individual survey pipelines. By transferring [\alpha/M] labels from APOGEE, The Cannon produces the first [\alpha/M] values measured from LAMOST spectra, and the largest catalog of [\alpha/M] for giant stars to date. This demonstrates that The Cannon can successfully bring different surveys onto the same label scale, and effectively transfer label systems from a high-resolution survey to low-resolution spectra.