arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1405.1484 [math.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Bipartite graphs whose squares are not chromatic-choosable

Seog-Jin Kim, Boram Park

Published 2014-05-07Version 1

The square $G^2$ of a graph $G$ is the graph defined on $V(G)$ such that two vertices $u$ and $v$ are adjacent in $G^2$ if the distance between $u$ and $v$ in $G$ is at most 2. Let $\chi(H)$ and $\chi_{\ell}(H)$ be the chromatic number and the list chromatic number of $H$, respectively. A graph $H$ is called {\em chromatic-choosable} if $\chi_{\ell} (H) = \chi(H)$. It is an interesting problem to find graphs that are chromatic-choosable. Motivated by the List Total Coloring Conjecture, Kostochka and Woodall (2001) proposed the List Square Coloring Conjecture which states that $G^2$ is chromatic-choosable for every graph $G$. Recently, Kim and Park showed that the List Square Coloring Conjecture does not hold in general by finding a family of graphs whose squares are complete multipartite graphs with partite sets of unbounded size. It is a well-known fact that the List Total Coloring Conjecture is true if the List Square Coloring Conjecture holds for special class of bipartite graphs. On the other hand, the counterexamples to the List Square Coloring Conjecture are not bipartite graphs. Hence a natural question is whether $G^2$ is chromatic-choosable or not for every bipartite graph $G$. In this paper, we give a bipartite graph $G$ such that $\chi_{\ell} (G^2) \neq \chi(G^2)$. Moreover, we show that the value $\chi_{\ell}(G^2) - \chi(G^2)$ can be arbitrarily large.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:1809.01259 [math.CO] (Published 2018-09-04)
Sidorenko's conjecture for blow-ups
arXiv:1505.03717 [math.CO] (Published 2015-05-14)
A note on $\mathtt{V}$-free $2$-matchings
arXiv:2009.06688 [math.CO] (Published 2020-09-14)
On the number of spanning trees in bipartite graphs