arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1310.2215 [astro-ph.SR]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

High resolution study of the abundance pattern of the heavy elements in very metal-poor field stars

Monique Spite, François Spite

Published 2013-10-08Version 1

The abundances of heavy elements in EMP stars are not well explained by the simple view of an initial basic "rapid" process. In a careful and homogeneous analysis of the "First stars" sample (eighty per cent of the stars have a metallicity [Fe/H]=-3.1$\pm$0.4), it has been shown that at this metallicity [Eu/Ba] is constant, and therefore the Eu-rich stars (generally called "r-rich") are also Ba-rich. The very large variation of [Ba/Fe] (existence of "r-poor" and "r-rich" stars) induces that the early matter was not perfectly mixed. On the other hand, the distribution of the values of [Sr/Ba] vs. [Ba/Fe] appears with well defined upper and lower envelopes. No star was found with [Sr/Ba]<-0.5 and the scatter of [Sr/Ba] increases regularly when [Ba/Fe] decreases. To explain this behavior, we suggest that an early "additional" process forming mainly first peak elements would affect the initial composition of the matter. For a same quantity of accreted matter, this additional Sr production would barely affect the r-rich matter (which already contains an important quantity of Sr) but would change significantly the composition of the r-poor matter. The abundances found in the CEMP-rs stars reflect the transfer of heavy elements from a defunct AGB companion. But the abundances of the heavy elements in CEMP-no stars present the same characteristics as the the abundances in the EMP stars.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:2411.04180 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2024-11-06)
Chemical Evolution of R-process Elements in Stars (CERES) II. The impact of stellar evolution and rotation on light and heavy elements
arXiv:2108.08132 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2021-08-18)
Heavy elements in barium stars
arXiv:2408.02643 [astro-ph.SR] (Published 2024-08-05)
Origin of LAMOST J1010+2358 Revisited