{ "id": "hep-th/9912253", "version": "v1", "published": "1999-12-27T07:24:32.000Z", "updated": "1999-12-27T07:24:32.000Z", "title": "Note on the Gauge Fixing in Gauge Theory", "authors": [ "Kazuo Fujikawa", "Hiroaki Terashima" ], "comment": "12 pages", "journal": "Nucl.Phys. B577 (2000) 405-415", "doi": "10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00102-4", "categories": [ "hep-th", "hep-lat", "hep-ph" ], "abstract": "In the absence of Gribov complications, the modified gauge fixing in gauge theory $ \\int{\\cal D}A_{\\mu}\\{\\exp[-S_{YM}(A_{\\mu})-\\int f(A_{\\mu})dx] /\\int{\\cal D}g\\exp[-\\int f(A_{\\mu}^{g})dx]\\}$ for example, $f(A_{\\mu})=(1/2)(A_{\\mu})^{2}$, is identical to the conventional Faddeev-Popov formula $\\int{\\cal D}A_{\\mu}\\{\\delta(D^{\\mu}\\frac{\\delta f(A_{\\nu})}{\\delta A_{\\mu}})/\\int {\\cal D}g\\delta(D^{\\mu}\\frac{\\delta f(A_{\\nu}^{g})} {\\delta A_{\\mu}^{g}})\\}\\exp[-S_{YM}(A_{\\mu})]$ if one takes into account the variation of the gauge field along the entire gauge orbit. Despite of its quite different appearance,the modified formula defines a local and BRST invariant theory and thus ensures unitarity at least in perturbation theory. In the presence of Gribov complications, as is expected in non-perturbative Yang-Mills theory, the modified formula is equivalent to the conventional formula but not identical to it:Both of the definitions give rise to non-local theory in general and thus the unitarity is not obvious. Implications of the present analysis on the lattice regularization are briefly discussed.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "1999-12-27T07:24:32.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "keywords": [ "gauge theory", "gauge fixing", "gribov complications", "entire gauge orbit", "brst invariant theory" ], "tags": [ "journal article" ], "publication": { "publisher": "Elsevier", "journal": "Nucl. Phys. B" }, "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 12, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "inspire": 512514 } } }