{
  "id": "astro-ph/9508009",
  "version": "v2",
  "published": "1995-08-02T22:09:33.000Z",
  "updated": "1995-08-21T20:41:10.000Z",
  "title": "Cold Dark Matter Resuscitated?",
  "authors": [
    "Martin White",
    "Douglas Scott",
    "Joe Silk",
    "Marc Davis"
  ],
  "comment": "6 pages, self-unpacking uuencoded compressed postscript, with 4 included figures, to appear in MNRAS. References added and Fig.3 corrected. Also available at http://physics7.berkeley.edu/cmbserve/gen.html",
  "journal": "Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.276:L69-L75,1995",
  "categories": [
    "astro-ph"
  ],
  "abstract": "The Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model has an elegant simplicitly which makes it very predictive, but when its parameters are fixed at their `canonical' values its predictions are in conflict with observational data. There is, however, much leeway in the initial conditions within the CDM framework. We advocate a re-examination of the CDM model, taking into account modest variation of parameters from their canonical values. We find that CDM models with $n=0.8$--0.9 and $h=0.45$--0.50 can fit the available data. Our ``best fit'' CDM model has $n=0.9$, $h=0.45$ and $C_2^{T}/C_2^{S}=0.7$. We discuss the current state of observations which could definitely rule out this model.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v2",
      "updated": "1995-08-21T20:41:10.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "cold dark matter",
      "cdm model",
      "account modest variation",
      "parameters",
      "best fit"
    ],
    "tags": [
      "journal article"
    ],
    "publication": {
      "doi": "10.1093/mnras/276.1.69L"
    },
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 6,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable",
      "inspire": 397894
    }
  }
}