{
  "id": "2009.07262",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2020-09-15T17:51:40.000Z",
  "updated": "2020-09-15T17:51:40.000Z",
  "title": "Report prepared by the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) for Publication Norms for Responsible AI by Partnership on AI",
  "authors": [
    "Abhishek Gupta",
    "Camylle Lanteigne",
    "Victoria Heath"
  ],
  "comment": "Report submitted to Partnership on AI for inclusion in their work on Publishing Norms for Responsible AI",
  "categories": [
    "cs.CY",
    "cs.AI"
  ],
  "abstract": "The history of science and technology shows that seemingly innocuous developments in scientific theories and research have enabled real-world applications with significant negative consequences for humanity. In order to ensure that the science and technology of AI is developed in a humane manner, we must develop research publication norms that are informed by our growing understanding of AI's potential threats and use cases. Unfortunately, it's difficult to create a set of publication norms for responsible AI because the field of AI is currently fragmented in terms of how this technology is researched, developed, funded, etc. To examine this challenge and find solutions, the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) collaborated with the Partnership on AI in May 2020 to host two public consultation meetups. These meetups examined potential publication norms for responsible AI, with the goal of creating a clear set of recommendations and ways forward for publishers. In its submission, MAIEI provides six initial recommendations, these include: 1) create tools to navigate publication decisions, 2) offer a page number extension, 3) develop a network of peers, 4) require broad impact statements, 5) require the publication of expected results, and 6) revamp the peer-review process. After considering potential concerns regarding these recommendations, including constraining innovation and creating a \"black market\" for AI research, MAIEI outlines three ways forward for publishers, these include: 1) state clearly and consistently the need for established norms, 2) coordinate and build trust as a community, and 3) change the approach.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2020-09-15T17:51:40.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "montreal ai ethics institute",
      "responsible ai",
      "partnership",
      "ais potential threats",
      "page number extension"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 0,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable"
    }
  }
}