{ "id": "2007.07101", "version": "v1", "published": "2020-07-14T15:21:17.000Z", "updated": "2020-07-14T15:21:17.000Z", "title": "Re-ranking for Writer Identification and Writer Retrieval", "authors": [ "Simon Jordan", "Mathias Seuret", "Pavel Král", "Ladislav Lenc", "Jiří Martínek", "Barbara Wiermann", "Tobias Schwinger", "Andreas Maier", "Vincent Christlein" ], "categories": [ "cs.CV" ], "abstract": "Automatic writer identification is a common problem in document analysis. State-of-the-art methods typically focus on the feature extraction step with traditional or deep-learning-based techniques. In retrieval problems, re-ranking is a commonly used technique to improve the results. Re-ranking refines an initial ranking result by using the knowledge contained in the ranked result, e. g., by exploiting nearest neighbor relations. To the best of our knowledge, re-ranking has not been used for writer identification/retrieval. A possible reason might be that publicly available benchmark datasets contain only few samples per writer which makes a re-ranking less promising. We show that a re-ranking step based on k-reciprocal nearest neighbor relationships is advantageous for writer identification, even if only a few samples per writer are available. We use these reciprocal relationships in two ways: encode them into new vectors, as originally proposed, or integrate them in terms of query-expansion. We show that both techniques outperform the baseline results in terms of mAP on three writer identification datasets.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v1", "updated": "2020-07-14T15:21:17.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "keywords": [ "writer retrieval", "re-ranking", "k-reciprocal nearest neighbor relationships", "feature extraction step", "benchmark datasets contain" ], "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 0, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable" } } }