{
  "id": "1910.04150",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2019-10-09T17:51:49.000Z",
  "updated": "2019-10-09T17:51:49.000Z",
  "title": "An Extended Survey on Vehicle Security",
  "authors": [
    "Chandra Sharma",
    "Samuel Moylan",
    "George Amariucai",
    "Eugene Y. Vasserman"
  ],
  "categories": [
    "cs.CR"
  ],
  "abstract": "The advanced electronic units with wireless capabilities inside modern vehicles have, enhanced the driving experience, but also introduced a myriad of security problems due to the inherent limitations of the internal communication protocol. In the last two decades, a number of security threats have been identified and accordingly, security measures have been proposed. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of security threats and countermeasures for the ubiquitous CAN bus communication protocol. Our review of the existing literature leads us to a observation of an overlooked simple, cost-effective, and incrementally deployable solution. Essentially, a reverse firewall, referred to in this paper as an icewall, can be an effective defense against a major class of packet-injection attacks and many denial of service attacks. We cover the fundamentals of the icewall in this paper. Further, by introducing the notion of human-in-the-loop, we discuss the subtle implications to its security when a human driver is accounted for.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2019-10-09T17:51:49.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "vehicle security",
      "extended survey",
      "security threats",
      "wireless capabilities inside modern vehicles",
      "bus communication protocol"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 0,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable"
    }
  }
}