arXiv Analytics

Sign in

arXiv:1808.09516 [astro-ph.CO]AbstractReferencesReviewsResources

Magnification bias in the shear-ratio test: a viable mitigation strategy

Sandra Unruh, Peter Schneider, Stefan Hilbert

Published 2018-08-28Version 1

Using the same lens galaxies, the ratios of tangential shears for different source galaxy redshifts is equal to the ratios of their corresponding angular-diameter distances. This is the so-called shear-ratio test (SRT) and it is valid when effects induced by the intervening large-scale structure (LSS) can be neglected. The dominant LSS effect is magnification bias which, on the one hand, induces an additional shear, and on the other hand, causes a magnification of the lens population. Our objective is to quantify the magnification bias for the SRT and show an easy-to-apply mitigation strategy that does not rely on additional observations. We use ray-tracing data through the Millennium simulation to measure the influence of magnification on the SRT and test our mitigation strategy. Using the SRT as a null-test we find deviations from zero up to $10 \%$ for a flux-limited sample of lens galaxies, which is a strong function of lens redshift and the lens-source line-of-sight separation. Using our mitigation strategy we can improve the null-test by a factor of $\sim \!100$.

Related articles: Most relevant | Search more
arXiv:0912.0614 [astro-ph.CO] (Published 2009-12-03, updated 2010-01-04)
Satellites in the field and lens galaxies: SDSS/COSMOS vs. SLACS/CLASS
arXiv:2101.05261 [astro-ph.CO] (Published 2021-01-13)
Magnification bias in galaxy surveys with complex sample selection functions
arXiv:1909.10539 [astro-ph.CO] (Published 2019-09-23)
Developing a unified pipeline for large-scale structure data analysis with angular power spectra -- II. A case study for magnification bias and radio continuum surveys