{
  "id": "1108.3533",
  "version": "v1",
  "published": "2011-08-17T17:30:27.000Z",
  "updated": "2011-08-17T17:30:27.000Z",
  "title": "Reply to Comment on \"High-Precision Determination of the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors of the Proton\"",
  "authors": [
    "J. C. Bernauer",
    "P. Achenbach",
    "C. Ayerbe Gayoso",
    "R. Böhm",
    "D. Bosnar",
    "L. Debenjak",
    "M. O. Distler",
    "L. Doria",
    "A. Esser",
    "H. Fonvieille",
    "J. M. Friedrich",
    "J. Friedrich",
    "M. Gómez Rodríguez de la Paz",
    "M. Makek",
    "H. Merkel",
    "D. G. Middleton",
    "U. Müller",
    "L. Nungesser",
    "J. Pochodzalla",
    "M. Potokar",
    "S. Sánchez Majos",
    "B. S. Schlimme",
    "S. Širca",
    "Th. Walcher",
    "M. Weinriefer"
  ],
  "comment": "1 page, 2 figure, To appear as a Reply Comment in Physical Review Letters",
  "categories": [
    "nucl-ex"
  ],
  "abstract": "In arXiv:1108.3058v1 [nucl-ex], Arrington criticizes the Coulomb corrections we applied in the analysis of high precision form factor data (see Phys.Rev.Lett.105:242001, 2010, arXiv:1007.5076v3 [nucl-ex]). We show, by comparing different calculations cited in the Comment, that the criticism of the Comment neglects the large uncertainty of \"more modern\" TPE corrections. This uncertainty has also been seen in recent polarized measurements. We rerun our analysis using one of these calculations. The results show that the Comment exaggerates the quantitative effect at small Q^2.",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": "v1",
      "updated": "2011-08-17T17:30:27.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "analyses": {
    "keywords": [
      "magnetic form factors",
      "high-precision determination",
      "high precision form factor data",
      "comment neglects",
      "comment exaggerates"
    ],
    "note": {
      "typesetting": "TeX",
      "pages": 1,
      "language": "en",
      "license": "arXiv",
      "status": "editable",
      "inspire": 924266,
      "adsabs": "2011arXiv1108.3533B"
    }
  }
}