{ "id": "0710.0819", "version": "v2", "published": "2007-10-03T17:38:23.000Z", "updated": "2008-01-22T14:49:05.000Z", "title": "Compactifying the state space for alternative theories of gravity", "authors": [ "Naureen Goheer", "Jannie A. Leach", "Peter K. S. Dunsby" ], "comment": "18 pages, revised to match published version", "journal": "Class.Quant.Grav.25:035013,2008", "doi": "10.1088/0264-9381/25/3/035013", "categories": [ "gr-qc", "astro-ph", "math.DS" ], "abstract": "In this paper we address important issues surrounding the choice of variables when performing a dynamical systems analysis of alternative theories of gravity. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of compactifying the state space, and illustrate this using two examples. We first show how to define a compact state space for the class of LRS Bianchi type I models in $R^n$-gravity and compare to a non--compact expansion--normalised approach. In the second example we consider the flat Friedmann matter subspace of the previous example, and compare the compact analysis to studies where non-compact non--expansion--normalised variables were used. In both examples we comment on the existence of bouncing or recollapsing orbits as well as the existence of static models.", "revisions": [ { "version": "v2", "updated": "2008-01-22T14:49:05.000Z" } ], "analyses": { "subjects": [ "05.45.-a", "98.80.Jk", "04.50.+h" ], "keywords": [ "alternative theories", "flat friedmann matter subspace", "address important issues", "compactifying", "compact state space" ], "tags": [ "journal article" ], "publication": { "publisher": "IOP", "journal": "Classical and Quantum Gravity", "year": 2008, "month": "Feb", "volume": 25, "number": 3, "pages": "035013" }, "note": { "typesetting": "TeX", "pages": 18, "language": "en", "license": "arXiv", "status": "editable", "inspire": 762916, "adsabs": "2008CQGra..25c5013G" } } }